somebody wrote:
> If you are going to suggest grid computing as a benefit, why not
> suggest pouring all 10 billion dollars into it? That would give much bigger
> and surer yields.

Not surer. You'd be guessing at what grid computing would *actually* 
need to be able to do. With the LHC, you have an excellent example of a 
collection of applications that need something like this.

Guessing at what some customer who never heard of your system might want 
out of a product is the surest way to build a product nobody wants.

-- 
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)

Post a reply to this message