|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Fredrik Eriksson <fe79}--at--{yahoo}--dot--{com> wrote:
> I think it might, but "claims to implement the full standard" is not the
> same as "claims to be fully standards-compliant" which of course is not
> the same as "is fully standards-compliant".
I think a lenient way of interpreting "fully standards-compliant" is
that the features of the C++ standard that the compiler implements are
implemented *exactly* like the standard specifies, and there are no
non-standard extensions (or, at the very least, there's a compiler option
to make it consider using them an error).
Many of the most modern C++ compilers implement almost all the C++98
standard features except export templates.
> Strictly speaking, it is impossible to be fully compliant to ISO
> 14882-1998 since the standard itself contains self-contradictions.
Care to give a concrete example?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |