|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> Mueen Nawaz <m.n### [at] ieee org> wrote:
> IMO there's the danger in such generic filtering that it will sometimes
> filter something which is *not* an ad, and might be relevant to the contents
> of the website.
Hasn't happened yet. Perhaps I did block non-ads, but they weren't
important enough for me to realize.
> I prefer using adblock on a site-by-site basis. In other words, whenever
> there's an obnoxious ad that bothers my concentration, I block images from
> that url+path.
I used to do it on a site basis, but it didn't work well for me. I
don't want to merely remove ads from sites I visit often. I want to
remove them from as many sites as possible, including a site I've never
seen that I may visit today.
--
Inoculatte: To take coffee intravenously when you are running late.
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawaz org<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |