Le Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:22:18 +1000, Chris Cason a modifié des petits
morceaux de l'univers pour nous faire lire :


> Suggestion: as an experiment, try changing the initial value of the
> cache (line 153) to a much larger value and see if the fault goes away.
> I suspect it will (note this is not the solution, just a test: the
> solution is to either avoid the need to resize, or to not keep
> references to the data across calls to the trace functions).
> 

It is far better (tried with a huge modifier of 10* ).
No more segfaults there.

Looks like a very good point.

Post a reply to this message