|
|
> Forget punishment, that's not even the point. Warp and some others think
> that *reporting* of the incident was wrong, and that the hacker should
> have
> been rewarded instead, which is an order of magnitude harder to
> understand.
Yeh, I didn't really understand why Warp said:
"That will teach him to never tell about his hacking again."
When the *telling* about the security hole is not the problem, the problem
is when he actually *did* the hacking on 32 students, and even much worse,
distributed the data to lots of people (and not just the system owners).
I know for sure that I could install a keylogger on my colleagues computer
and get his password. Does that mean that I should be allowed to do it
without permission from the system owners and send the results to my
friends, "for the sake of improving security"? Absolutely no way, not in a
million years.
Post a reply to this message
|
|