|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> Imperative OO languages still correspond better to
> how people naturally think of tasks.
>
> People don't think of tasks with recursive mathematical definitions.
No, they don't. Generally.
However, people quite often do think in set-based terms. Most people
don't have too much of a problem learning SQL, for example. (Although
having said that, some people insist on processing tasks row by row
rather than using a set-based solution...)
Haskell makes set-based thinking quite easy and natural.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |