Gail wrote:
> 
> "Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message 
> news:48ca7536$1@news.povray.org...
>>
>> I guess it depends what you're trying to do. SQL certainly has a few 
>> known flaws (default column orderings, anyone?), but in general it 
>> makes it quite simple and easy to do most things.
> 
> What column orderings?

Apparently some people consider it a bug that you can write queries that 
depend on the order in which columns are returned (rather than by 
explicit column names). Since relations are supposed to be sets, that 
shouldn't be the case.

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message