Invisible wrote:
>> I figure that if you use the std::string class you're safe from that. 
>> I haven't tried, though.
> 
> Wait... you mean they made it a class?

	Well, you *do* know that was the whole point of C++, right?

	Trust me - I felt like you for a long time. Until I finally found a 
good, recent book. Then I realized I'd been learning it the wrong way 
all along.

	Most of the books I had read assumed you didn't know too much about 
programming, and would emphasize basic skills: Loops, arrays, even 
C-style strings (character arrays). They'd make sure you could do the 
basics. Stuff like vectors would be introduced way at the end, and stuff 
like sets and maps often not at all.

	I didn't need a book that taught me the basics of programming. I assume 
you don't either. So finally I got a book that taught me how things 
should be done in C++. Then I realized C++ code doesn't have to be 
*that* ugly.


-- 
Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard-disk.


                     /\  /\               /\  /
                    /  \/  \ u e e n     /  \/  a w a z
                        >>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
                                    anl

Post a reply to this message