|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:17:40 -0400, Warp wrote:
> St. <dot### [at] dot com> wrote:
>
>> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
>> news:48bdabc6$1@news.povray.org...
>> > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:13:26 -0400, Warp wrote:
>> >
>> >> Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
>> >>> Parametric polymorphism, I choose you!
>> >>
>> >>> Now polymorph, type-safe high-order function attack!
>> >>
>> >> Would that be the generic programming trading cards, anime, or
>> >> computer
>> >> games? Have you collected them all?
>> >>
>> >> Although at your age... sheesh. The target audience of those
>> >> paradigms
>> >> is really preteen children, you know.
>> >
>> > Oh, christ, you mean you NEVER do silly things? Ever?
>> >
>> > Give Andy a break. Why do you feel it is your duty to attack him
>> > when he does something silly?
>
>> Jim, with our vast knowledge around here in all types of
>> lifestyles,
>> let Warp have his opinion.
>
>> We've all done silly things, and I'm no exception. I've done my
>> fair
>> share for sure. But it's like Andrew *needs* to listen to others'
>> thoughts and experiences?
>
> Now I'm *completely* puzzled. How on earth could my response be
> anything
> else than a humorous response in the same spirit as the original post?
> :-o
>
> Do you really think I wrote things like "generic programming trading
> cards" as some kind of reproach or attack, rather than a joke?
>
> I knew that people will always interpret things in the worst possible
> way,
> but this is just ridiculous.
"At your age, sheesh...." is what I was responding to. And I was having
a bad day, apologies all around if I read it wrong.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |