"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message 
news:48bdbb84@news.povray.org...
> St. <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
>> news:48bdabc6$1@news.povray.org...
>> > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:13:26 -0400, Warp wrote:
>> >
>> >> Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> >>> Parametric polymorphism, I choose you!
>> >>
>> >>> Now polymorph, type-safe high-order function attack!
>> >>
>> >>   Would that be the generic programming trading cards, anime, or
>> >>   computer
>> >> games? Have you collected them all?
>> >>
>> >>   Although at your age... sheesh. The target audience of those 
>> >> paradigms
>> >> is really preteen children, you know.
>> >
>> > Oh, christ, you mean you NEVER do silly things?  Ever?
>> >
>> > Give Andy a break.  Why do you feel it is your duty to attack him when 
>> > he
>> > does something silly?
>
>>      Jim, with our vast knowledge around here in all types of lifestyles,
>> let Warp have his opinion.
>
>>      We've all done silly things, and I'm no exception. I've done my fair
>> share for sure. But it's like Andrew *needs* to listen to others' 
>> thoughts
>> and experiences?
>
>  Now I'm *completely* puzzled. How on earth could my response be anything
> else than a humorous response in the same spirit as the original post? :-o
>
>  Do you really think I wrote things like "generic programming trading
> cards" as some kind of reproach or attack, rather than a joke?
>
>  I knew that people will always interpret things in the worst possible 
> way,
> but this is just ridiculous.


       You posted a link? Cool. I didn't know that because I didn't read the 
whole thread. Damn me. I assumed Jim was replying to one of your many 
putdowns of various people around here, (including myself now), heh... ;)

  I should just butt out and let you misfits get on with it for my enjoyable 
reading.

    <lesson #145,632 learnt>

    ~Steve~



>
> -- 
>                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message