St. <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:

> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message 
> news:48bdabc6$1@news.povray.org...
> > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:13:26 -0400, Warp wrote:
> >
> >> Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> >>> Parametric polymorphism, I choose you!
> >>
> >>> Now polymorph, type-safe high-order function attack!
> >>
> >>   Would that be the generic programming trading cards, anime, or
> >>   computer
> >> games? Have you collected them all?
> >>
> >>   Although at your age... sheesh. The target audience of those paradigms
> >> is really preteen children, you know.
> >
> > Oh, christ, you mean you NEVER do silly things?  Ever?
> >
> > Give Andy a break.  Why do you feel it is your duty to attack him when he
> > does something silly?

>      Jim, with our vast knowledge around here in all types of lifestyles, 
> let Warp have his opinion.

>      We've all done silly things, and I'm no exception. I've done my fair 
> share for sure. But it's like Andrew *needs* to listen to others' thoughts 
> and experiences?

  Now I'm *completely* puzzled. How on earth could my response be anything
else than a humorous response in the same spirit as the original post? :-o

  Do you really think I wrote things like "generic programming trading
cards" as some kind of reproach or attack, rather than a joke?

  I knew that people will always interpret things in the worst possible way,
but this is just ridiculous.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message