|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
St. <dot### [at] dot com> wrote:
> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
> news:48bdabc6$1@news.povray.org...
> > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:13:26 -0400, Warp wrote:
> >
> >> Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> >>> Parametric polymorphism, I choose you!
> >>
> >>> Now polymorph, type-safe high-order function attack!
> >>
> >> Would that be the generic programming trading cards, anime, or
> >> computer
> >> games? Have you collected them all?
> >>
> >> Although at your age... sheesh. The target audience of those paradigms
> >> is really preteen children, you know.
> >
> > Oh, christ, you mean you NEVER do silly things? Ever?
> >
> > Give Andy a break. Why do you feel it is your duty to attack him when he
> > does something silly?
> Jim, with our vast knowledge around here in all types of lifestyles,
> let Warp have his opinion.
> We've all done silly things, and I'm no exception. I've done my fair
> share for sure. But it's like Andrew *needs* to listen to others' thoughts
> and experiences?
Now I'm *completely* puzzled. How on earth could my response be anything
else than a humorous response in the same spirit as the original post? :-o
Do you really think I wrote things like "generic programming trading
cards" as some kind of reproach or attack, rather than a joke?
I knew that people will always interpret things in the worst possible way,
but this is just ridiculous.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |