-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Reactor wrote:
> "gregjohn" <pte### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>> I have been using blender.  It has both a "blender internal" renderer
>> (scanline??) and a "yafray" (ray-tacing??) rendering engine.
>>
>> Q: Would either of the IRTC or TC-RTC have an objection to the use of the
>> "blender internal" engine?   If either do, could someone unpack for me the
>> aesthetics, ethics, or  politics behind the distinction between scanline and
>> ray-tracing?
>>
>> thanks.
> 
> 
> This is mentioned in the rules of the TC-IRTC and the original IRTC.
> http://www.tc-rtc.co.uk/rules/index.html
> http://www.irtc.org/stills/faq.html#q1.1.7
> 
> Both permit the use of any 3D package (any modeler or renderer).
> 
	Plus, anyway the Blender internal engine features both a scanline
and a raytracing mode...

		Jerome
- --
+------------------------- Jerome M. BERGER ---------------------+
|    mailto:jeb### [at] freefr      | ICQ:    238062172            |
|    http://jeberger.free.fr/     | Jabber: jeb### [at] jabberfr   |
+---------------------------------+------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAki0afoACgkQd0kWM4JG3k8R+QCeLwqTn1yVY02ups6yO36Ly4Mo
8pcAn01X6LU5IUnmr6IkZIo6pggqglUc
=t8+5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Post a reply to this message