Darren New wrote:
> Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>> and it fails because it does exactly that?
> 
> No. It succeeds if it does exactly that. I didn't say "fail" anywhere. 
> If you're referring to the blog post calling it a "fail", well, I think 
> you've missed his point.
> 
>> could. Maybe he should really be complaining about how these 'long 
>> use, stable libraries' keep having updates. Why won't those developers 
>> just leave it alone!

(I hate RDP not always catching the key-up. :-)

Yes, I suspect the "long use stable libraries" shouldn't be adding 
important features. If you have features in 2.10 that you can't possibly 
get away without using, then I wouldn't call 2.6 the "long use stable 
libraries."  But that's just terminology.

-- 
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)

Post a reply to this message