|
|
Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> and it fails because it does exactly that?
No. It succeeds if it does exactly that. I didn't say "fail" anywhere.
If you're referring to the blog post calling it a "fail", well, I think
you've missed his point.
> could. Maybe he should really be complaining
> about how these 'long use, stable libraries' keep having updates. Why
> won't those developers just leave it alone!
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
|