POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Metric redux : Re: Metric redux Server Time
7 Sep 2024 07:25:36 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Metric redux  
From: andrel
Date: 14 Oct 2008 17:11:45
Message: <48F50B61.40604@hotmail.com>
On 14-Oct-08 22:51, Darren New wrote:
> andrel wrote:
>> Whereas if you made something in multiples of 32 you'd be wasting a 
>> lot when using 120cm. So your point is that as soon as men defines a 
>> measure only small integers and powers of 10 times that unit are allowed?
> 
> Um, no. My point is that 12 has many more divisors than 10 does. Why 
> would you have multiples of 32 of something?

why not? very dividable by powers of two.

> 
>> I don't think that supports your point. 
> 
> You seem to think it's I who is arguing with you. I'm just relating what 
> I read, in an interview with some carpenters.

I know. What made you think I didn't?

> Whether you think it's logical or not is your call.

indeed, and I think it is totally nonsense. It may be true for some 
class of carpenters. Mainly for those with no relevant education and no 
skills in carpentry. Either the lowest ranking on the job or the 
manager. I'll probably see my uncle (who was a good carpenter) in two 
weeks time and ask him what he thinks about it. I might change my mind 
if he confirms.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.