|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New wrote:
> Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>> The cost of malpractice issues is going to show up somewhere, though.
>
> The problem is more that something like 25% of all doctors get sued for
> malpractice in their first five years. If "malpractice" is something so
> bad even a layman can understand how bad it is, then either way too many
> people are suing for malpractice or the medical schools are turning out
> complete morons.
>
> Not that there aren't good situations for malpractice, but the doctor
> failing to cure you isn't necessarily a malpractice case.
But, doctors hurried so much by the insurance companies that they miss
simple signs of diseases and fail to cure them, is that malpractice?
It's not too hard to spot the difference between scarlet fever and strep
throat, if you have more then 2 minutes per patient.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |