andrel wrote:
> No you gave a website that discusses the 'observable universe' which is 
> a totally different beast than the size of the universe at some moment 
> in time.

Two fallacies: (1) "observable universe" technically is the same as 
"universe".  (2) "moment in time" is a meaningless term, even for things 
fairly close together, let alone separated in a spacelike way.

In other words, define "universe" first. This gets you into Clinton 
areas, of trying to define what "is" is.

-- 
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
  Helpful housekeeping hints:
   Check your feather pillows for holes
    before putting them in the washing machine.

Post a reply to this message