Chambers wrote:
> So we've got a judge who admits that the officer broke the law, but he 
> "didn't think the officer did anything wrong."

Sometimes the law is bad.

I got a ticket once for running out of passing zone while passing. When 
I went to court, the judge said "where did this happen?"  I told him. He 
  said "Yeah, I know that road. The passing zone is too short. Case 
dismissed."

Not that it happens often, mind.

> I'd like to know why this man is a judge, and why we trust him to decide 
> questions about guilt and innocence when he cannot understand that 
> breaking they law is the definition of wrong.

It isn't, in the USA at least. That's what juries are for. :-)

-- 
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
  Helpful housekeeping hints:
   Check your feather pillows for holes
    before putting them in the washing machine.

Post a reply to this message