|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Chambers wrote:
> So we've got a judge who admits that the officer broke the law, but he
> "didn't think the officer did anything wrong."
Sometimes the law is bad.
I got a ticket once for running out of passing zone while passing. When
I went to court, the judge said "where did this happen?" I told him. He
said "Yeah, I know that road. The passing zone is too short. Case
dismissed."
Not that it happens often, mind.
> I'd like to know why this man is a judge, and why we trust him to decide
> questions about guilt and innocence when he cannot understand that
> breaking they law is the definition of wrong.
It isn't, in the USA at least. That's what juries are for. :-)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Helpful housekeeping hints:
Check your feather pillows for holes
before putting them in the washing machine.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |