Warp wrote:
>   (Another less fancy way would be to return a null pointer from the
> function, in which case the program will end with a segmentation fault.)

Well, maybe if you're lucky. :-) Otherwise, it just goes off happily 
executing whatever is at memory address zero (or whatever NULL maps to).

-- 
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
  Helpful housekeeping hints:
   Check your feather pillows for holes
    before putting them in the washing machine.

Post a reply to this message