|
|
Warp wrote:
>
> At least here in some of the biggest cities there are lanes on the biggest
> roads which are reserved exclusively for the use of buses, taxis and
> emergency vehicles. Other people are prohibited from using that lane by
> law. If they use the lane, they get fined.
There are signs on those lanes sayin "BUS" or "BUS/TAXI" oslt defining
who can drive on it (taxis aren't actually allowed to drive on bus-only
-lane, but they do - and don't get fined).
There are also signs saying "Parking prohibited except for police cars".
What I understood there was no such sign where the officet got the fine.
> Is this exemption unfair and a slippery slope? Is it unfair that *some*
> people (such as bus drivers and the police) can use the special lane but
> not others?
No, it's strictly specified. What's unfair and a slippery slope is those
taxi drivers that don't get fined by driving on a bus-only -lane and
polices driving on a walk-only -road while patrolling (which happens *a
> Or is this exemption there in order to make traffic more fluent and
> less troublesome?
Yes.
> Why couldn't the police be exempted from parking prohibitions, as long
> as they do it in a manner that doesn't cause problems to anyone? I just
> can't see any rational reason.
They could, but they aren't.
OTOH, why couldn't anyone else be exempted from parking prohibitions, if
they manage to do it in a manner that doesn't cause problems to anyone?
(Yes, I did cut away number of reasons to allow this for police forces -
it doesn't affect on reasons for denying it for other people).
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|