Chambers wrote:

>   "Traffic Court Judge Terry Hannon said he didn't think the officer did 
> anything wrong but he had to find Stensgaard guilty because he violated 
> the letter of the law."
> 
> So we've got a judge who admits that the officer broke the law, but he 
> "didn't think the officer did anything wrong."

When has any judge ever let a common Joe off of the hook under the exact 
same circumstances?  When has a judge ever let a person prone to such 
let-off-the-hook thinking serve on a jury?

Regards,
John

Post a reply to this message