> Well... it looks fine to me, that's all I'm saying. ;-)

But "fine" is nowhere near what you see in real life.  While there is still 
an obvious gap between real life and what you can reproduce, there will no 
doubt be improvements in the future.

> OK, well that's pretty weird. I wonder why they suddenly changed it to 48 
> kHz then...?

Well don't forget, that there was nothing widespread before DVD that 
recorded films in a digital format.  For some reason 48 kHz was pretty 
standard in the music recording industry, even after CD came along with it's 
lower sampler rate.  I guess in the film industry they stuck with 48 kHz (as 
films were obviously never put onto CDs), but then when DVD came along it 
made sense to have a 48 kHz soundtrack if everything was recorded at 48 kHz 
anyway.

Post a reply to this message