On 22-Jul-08 23:28, Gail Shaw wrote:
> "andrel" <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
> news:488### [at] hotmailcom...
>> On 22-Jul-08 22:42, Gail Shaw wrote:
>>> "Mike Raiford" <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
>>> news:4885e8a7$1@news.povray.org...
>>>> Whatever machine that was running on is a BEAST.
>>> I'm glad the server team's testing out on the really, really big
> servers.
>>> The last thing you want in a server OS is a subtle bug that only
> manifests
>>> on servers with lots of CPUs/lots of memory
>> is that sarcasm?
> 
> No.
> 
> SQL Server 2005 did have a 'bug' that only manifested on servers with more
> than 20 GB memory. Don't want the same to happen with the OS.
> 

Ah, ok, didn't know that. I did know that quite a lot of the things MS 
make have trouble running on an average machine when the software comes 
on the market. But that was not what you were referring to.

Post a reply to this message