>> I own Photoshop Elements now. It's not very impressive.
>>
> 
> PS Elememts is ... meh .. It lacks some key features, such as Masking. 
> Hell... lacking that alone is grounds for death IMO. You're better of 
> with GIMP. ;)

I got it free with my shiny new Wacom tablet. ;-)

>> I have no idea how that's even theoretically possible.
> 
> Depends. Small tears and missing chunks are really easy using clone and 
> heal tools. Larger tears and missing chunks require a more "creative" 
> approach. See the attached images.

OK, that's just absurd. The sofa and the rug are *exactly* the same 
colour. How the hell can the machine tell them apart? Additionally, how 
on earth can it tell what colour they were originally? That's impossible...

>>> Heck. You can do this for free, too ;)
>>
>> Not really. You still have to buy the PC. :-P
>>
> 
> Well, assuming you already have the PC... If you don't you can still 
> accomplish your goal for under $1000.

Well, yeah. I mean, if you just want to render some 3D scenes with 
POV-Ray and stick them on a DVD, you don't even need that much. You can 
probably buy a PC with a DVD burner and some movie authorising software 

anything with such a slow CPU, but if you wait long enough it'll do it.





> I've seen someone actually make a pretty impressive short film using 
> Windows Movie Maker and a $50 pocket camera.

That makes no sense. I can't get Windows Movie Maker to do *anything* 
useful...

(But then, I can't get 3D Studio Max to do anything beyond rendering 
polygon meshes either, and yet it's ment to be "the most powerful 
modeller in the world"...)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message