|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
somebody wrote:
> That's not clear to me. Note that "unreleased resources" ...etc need not be
> leaks.
Possibly not. Possibly they were released but not as early as they
should have been.
> It just doesn't make sense to me to be able to claim a 50% reduction in
> memory in a leaky application, unless they halved the leaks as well instead
> of eliminating them <g>
Yeah. In any case, it's obvious that it's not going to be resolved on
the basis of *that* article. :-)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Helpful housekeeping hints:
Check your feather pillows for holes
before putting them in the washing machine.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |