"andrel" <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:488### [at] hotmailcom...

> > Ah, sorry, I misread. You aer correct.
> > The definition of "previously disadvantaged" is disadvantaged by the
> > government that was in power until 1994.
> > Logically, that means that no one born after 1994 can be considered
> > "previously disadvantaged".
>
> And, are they?

At the moment, yes. There's been some discussion about narrowing the scope
of the "previously disadvantaged" tag, but nothing's been done.
It would not be in the ruling party's favor to do that though, as many of
their strongest supporters are in the 'youth league'

> The ones I meet, yes. People from Johannesburg have this strange habit
> to tell how wonderful it is there and if you come there you'll have a
> fantastic time.

We feel obliged to counter the bad publicity the country gets

> I'll do that. It'll probably be somewhere in August/September. Have any
> plans?

For 2015? Not at the moment. <g>

Post a reply to this message