"Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote
> And lo on Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:25:55 +0100, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
> did spake, saying:

> > http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/That-Wouldve-Been-an-Option-Too.aspx

> "a developer had to step in and restart the site to release resources"
>
> Wouldn't that suggest that bunging some more memory in would only increase
> the time it took to fill up?

No. If there was a leak, they wouldn't have reduced the memory footprint by
50%.

Post a reply to this message