Warp wrote:

>   Unless more "WTF" details are given about this story, I'd have to say
> this is a "false WTF". It might sound like a WTF at first, but isn't.
> The priorities should be "fix bugs first, then buy more hardware", not
> the other way around.

For me, the WTF moment is that everybody else thought that just throwing 
more hardware at the problem would somehow be a "better" solution than 
actually fixing the underlying problem. But maybe that's just me...

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message