On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:33:34 -0400, Warp wrote:

> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:51:59 -0400, Warp wrote:
> 
>> > Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> >> Words do have more than a single definition, typically. ;-)
>> > 
>> >   Tell that to the FSF.
> 
>> Well, you're the one saying you don't understand their usage....
> 
>   I didn't say I don't understand it. I said I completely disagree with
>   it.

So you don't think there's any definition of "free" that applies other 
than "free of cost"?  Interesting interpretation of the English language, 
that....

Jim

Post a reply to this message