Warp wrote:
>   So is the "traditional" definition because it says absolutely nothing
> about the processor nor the computer architecture.

I think the real problem is that CPUs have gotten complex enough that 
there's no long a single dimension along which you measure "size." It's 
like arguing over whether something is "CISC" or "RISC".

-- 
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
  Helpful housekeeping hints:
   Check your feather pillows for holes
    before putting them in the washing machine.

Post a reply to this message