Warp wrote:
> So is the "traditional" definition because it says absolutely nothing
> about the processor nor the computer architecture.
I think the real problem is that CPUs have gotten complex enough that
there's no long a single dimension along which you measure "size." It's
like arguing over whether something is "CISC" or "RISC".
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Helpful housekeeping hints:
Check your feather pillows for holes
before putting them in the washing machine.
Post a reply to this message
|