"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:4877ba85@news.povray.org...

>   It kind of "makes sense" that there are "more" reals than integers.
> What is more unintuitive is that the amount of rational numbers is the
> same as the amount of integers.

And now the really fun part: Is there a subset of real numbers that is "more
numerous" than intergers or rationals but less so than reals?

Post a reply to this message