|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> Isn't it a bit ironic that each new version of Windows adds more things
> the user can *not* do, instead of the opposite?
Kind of sucks when the customer isn't always the user, doesn't it? :-)
> In theory it could be possible to tie hardware with a specific OS.
We have that. They're called cell phones. Or microwave ovens. Or iPhones.
Invisible wrote:
> How about if you design hardware so that it will only run "authorised"
> software
Yeah. This is the iPhone, and Apple is slowly moving the rest of their
OS that direction.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Helpful housekeeping hints:
Check your feather pillows for holes
before putting them in the washing machine.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |