|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Gail Shaw wrote:
>
>> From what I heard from one of the devs some time back, was that WinFS was
>> dropped because the feature set they were given was too ambitious.
>> Instead
>> of starting small and building on that, the project was scoped to do
>> everything at once. It was taking too long and producing too little
>> and got
>> scrapped.
>>
>> It was more a failure of management than of technology.
>>
>> Wasn't a complete loss. Several of the senior devs got folded into the
>> SQL
>> Server dev team and contributed to enhancements of the SQL storage
>> engine,
>> including the FileStream feature.
>
> ...says our resident MVP. ;-)
>
By the way, congrats on that :)
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|