On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:52:00 -0700, Darren New wrote:

> Well, that's true. There are supposed to be certain things you can't
> tell. Like, the defendant has already been convicted of other crimes -
> that isn't evidence that she did *this* crime.  Or the evidence the
> police obtained illegally, which should discourage police from obtaining
> evidence illegally.

Yeah; in the case I sat the jury for, we didn't find out until afterwards 
that the reason the cops were at the guy's house was because they were 
serving a warrant for the manufacture of methamphetamine.  We were just 
told that they were serving a warrant.  With a SWAT team.

Jim

Post a reply to this message