|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
>>> Actually Windows 3.1 could run in much less, and Win95 could run with
>>> 4 MB (I have direct experience of this).
>
>> Right. So it's the AOL client that's requiring all this then? [I just
>> remembered: IT'S AOL!!] Nothing new there then! ;-)
>
> Well, just launching IE and surfing the internet (even back then)
> probably required more than those 4 MB.
Don't know if you were joking, but Win '95 + IE worked fine on 4MB RAM.
--
"I think not," said Descartes, and promptly disappeared.
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawaz org<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |