On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:26:00 -0500, Mueen Nawaz wrote:

> 	In the article I read, they either declined to comment or did not 
give
> a better explanation.
> 
> 	To an extent, I think the claims about that incident were a bit 
off.
> The BBC article title implied he was not allowed on due to a security
> concern. However, the end of the article suggested that it was not to
> offend other passengers (put in the same category as having a shirt with
> expletives).

We must've read the same article - bbc.co.uk?  I do think that there's 
more to the story than was there.  The scary thing is that even as 
written, it's believable.

Jim

Post a reply to this message