Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> Goes back to the earlier discussion of how much manipulation makes a 
>> photo "unreal".
> 
>   IMO it makes it unreal when it adds something relevant which was not
> there or removes something which was.

I agree. That's why I thought compositing several exposures of the same 
scene wasn't making it "unreal".

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message