Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
>> Goes back to the earlier discussion of how much manipulation makes a
>> photo "unreal".
>
> IMO it makes it unreal when it adds something relevant which was not
> there or removes something which was.
I agree. That's why I thought compositing several exposures of the same
scene wasn't making it "unreal".
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|