Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> Incidentally, the fount of all wisdom (google+wikipedia) says you're 
>> mistaken.
> 
>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feinberg_reinterpretation_principle#Modern_interpretation:_Quantum_field_theory_and_causality
> 
>   How much weight should be put into claims about hypothetical particles
> for which there's absolutely no proof nor experimental evidence that
> they exist?

Oh, perhaps just a touch more weight than your assertion about 
paradoxes, I'd say?

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message