|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible wrote:
> "Real-world problems are simply degenerate cases of pure mathematical
> problems."
I recently attended a talk given by Arthur Jaffe, a (co)founder of the
Clay institute and professor at Harvard (forgot if he's in the math or
physics dept). His work is mathematical physics.
I don't know his stance, but he knows many top physicists and perhaps
mathematicians as well who'd disagree. Essentially, the (very boring)
talk was about this very issue: Are mathematics and physics consistent
with each other?
A lot of the calculations in physics as currently performed are
actually mathematically invalid. He gave this startling example. You see
the g_s in the equation on this page?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_moment#Magnetic_moment_of_electrons
It has now been measured to around 12 significant figures - perhaps the
most precise measurement ever made. Those 12 figures agree with theory.
And that theory is simply mathematically invalid (at least with the
current state of mathematics).
You just have to "think" differently to do serious theoretical physics.
From what little I've studied, I seriously think mathematics is a bit
easier. At least in math, you're bound by certain rules - everything has
to be logical and provable. In physics, I see them do wild things (i.e.
mathematically questionable) fairly frequently and get good results. I
just can't think that "freely" and ignore the fact that my infinities
can be neglected, or something.
--
Why is the person who invests all your money called a broker?
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawaz org<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |