POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : FPGAs : Re: FPGAs Server Time
7 Sep 2024 17:13:32 EDT (-0400)
  Re: FPGAs  
From: Invisible
Date: 30 May 2008 08:14:23
Message: <483fef9f$1@news.povray.org>
Chris Cason wrote:

> NB at it appears you are interested in getting into hardware, you might be
> interested in looking at the Hammer board:
> 
>   http://www.tincantools.com/
> 
> Particularly their hammer kit, which comes with a very nice prototyping
> board. I have one of these and it's easily the best of the various embedded
> development kits I've had over the years. My previous platform for personal
> projects (up until a few months ago) was the gumstix (gumstix.com) but
> while it's OK for plug-and-play, I found doing custom hardware work with it
> to be a bit of a pain (particularly due to its small connectors and overall
> mechanical setup).
> 
> The nice thing about the hammer (apart from the dev board) is the fact it's
> got a standard 40-pin DIP form-factor, meaning it's very easy to wire into
> custom projects. Of course you lose some flexibility in that you have very
> few I/O pins to play with, but currently it's got all I need.

Mmm, interesting...

I seem to have misplaced it, but *somewhere* I have a box of 7400s and 
some breadboard. If you chop up lots of wire and hot A LOT of patience, 
you can wire up arbitrary logic devices with it. Latches, counters, 
mutiplexers, etc. I always wanted to sit down and wire up an actual 
processor. I mean, it's one thing thinking you know roughly how to do 
it. But the proof is in DOING it. ;-)

I just thought an FPGA sounds easier than plugging in millions of wires 
and then trying to figure out why nothing is working. :-}

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.