|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Gilles Tran wrote:
> 48378332@news.povray.org...
>
>> I don't get it. To me the image is not exactly photo-realistic. Am I
>> missing something, or do people commonly refer to CG images as "photos?"
>
> This sounds strange since 3D CG are everywhere these days, but many people
> really don't know at all about rendered computer graphics, even among
> professional designers: anything vaguely realistic is a photograph or a
> photographic collage made with Photoshop. Either they never heard of CG
> technology, or if they did they just assumed that it was some kind of
> digital photography, but the concept of 3D modelling and rendering is
> completely foreign to them.
I don't see how this is possible, considering Pixar has released so many
CG films in the last... decade or so.
> In any case I'm glad that picture got noticed (even if they should
> definitely have asked for permission). I was in charge of selecting the pics
> for the new HOF in 2004 and I went through the p.b.i archives to find your
> work.
>
> G.
Well, I suppose I should voice my gratitude. Thanks :)
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |