|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Mueen Nawaz wrote:
> stbenge wrote:
>> http://hof.povray.org/indoor_aqueduct.html
>>
>> I don't get it. To me the image is not exactly photo-realistic. Am I
>> missing something, or do people commonly refer to CG images as "photos?"
>
> At a quick glance, it's not obvious. The first giveaway was some
> visible aliasing.
The original image was large, so any aliasing could have been avoided
when scaling it.
>> Should I contact the author or just sit here smiling silently? (BTW,
>> the author never contacted me for permission to use the image, but I
>> don't really care, I just find this funny)
>
> Threaten them with a lawsuit for copyright violation unless they
> stop referring to it as a photo. Make up a story about how your career
> in CGI has been compromised because people think you're cheating by just
> taking photos.<G>
Lol, funny :)
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |