On Sat, 17 May 2008 11:03:23 -0400, Jim Charter wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 12:45:41 +0100, Phil Cook wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Does it look
>>>fake/better/worse?
>> 
>> 
>> Well, the part that I'm looking at is the huge white bloom from the
>> main windows on the street corner.  The problem is that the details are
>> lost because of the exposure, and that data isn't recoverable from the
>> original image AFAIK (ie, the CCD just registered white).  The issue is
>> a faster exposure will make the rest of the image too dark to pick out
>> the details.
>> 
> And there was a lot of interesting detail in that window, multiple
> parallel nean lights in different colors I think.

Yeah, I was thinking that might be the case - would be great to be able 
to get that detail into the photo.

Jim

Post a reply to this message