|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sat, 17 May 2008 11:03:23 -0400, Jim Charter wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 12:45:41 +0100, Phil Cook wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Does it look
>>>fake/better/worse?
>>
>>
>> Well, the part that I'm looking at is the huge white bloom from the
>> main windows on the street corner. The problem is that the details are
>> lost because of the exposure, and that data isn't recoverable from the
>> original image AFAIK (ie, the CCD just registered white). The issue is
>> a faster exposure will make the rest of the image too dark to pick out
>> the details.
>>
> And there was a lot of interesting detail in that window, multiple
> parallel nean lights in different colors I think.
Yeah, I was thinking that might be the case - would be great to be able
to get that detail into the photo.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |