|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 12:45:41 +0100, Phil Cook wrote:
>
>
>>Does it look
>>fake/better/worse?
>
>
> Well, the part that I'm looking at is the huge white bloom from the main
> windows on the street corner. The problem is that the details are lost
> because of the exposure, and that data isn't recoverable from the
> original image AFAIK (ie, the CCD just registered white). The issue is a
> faster exposure will make the rest of the image too dark to pick out the
> details.
>
And there was a lot of interesting detail in that window, multiple
parallel nean lights in different colors I think.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |