Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 12:45:41 +0100, Phil Cook wrote:
> 
> 
>>Does it look
>>fake/better/worse?
> 
> 
> Well, the part that I'm looking at is the huge white bloom from the main 
> windows on the street corner.  The problem is that the details are lost 
> because of the exposure, and that data isn't recoverable from the 
> original image AFAIK (ie, the CCD just registered white).  The issue is a 
> faster exposure will make the rest of the image too dark to pick out the 
> details.
> 
And there was a lot of interesting detail in that window, multiple 
parallel nean lights in different colors I think.

Post a reply to this message