Warp wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>composite the pictures together.
> 
> 
>   Somehow I have never liked that type of post-processing in photography.
> It gives me the feeling that the photo has been faked.
> 
Hmmm, I suppose, but I also thought that the lines of people ready to 
muse upon truth and artifice in photography were wide and deep. Analogue 
cameras were bad enough, but now that the capture is digital and 
probably filtered digitally from the start, at least that is what I 
assume my camera's different shooting 'modes' are,...it seems that 
'faked' is an increasingly relative term.  I'm surprised there isn't 
already a camera that would perform such compositing automatically and 
present the result as truth.  And can we really say it isn't?

Post a reply to this message