|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Kenneth wrote:
> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
>
>> In Zeger's example, I would replace .gray by .red (or .green or .blue).
>> Parsing will be much faster, for the same result.
>>
>
>
> That's interesting. Due, no doubt, to the extra calculations POV has to perform
> in turning a full RGB pigment into .gray.
>
> A more accurate way of getting the pigment pattern's colors into grayscale
> would be to substitute a PATTERN for the PIGMENT; it's already in grayscale.
> I.e., pattern{bozo...} And--as far as I can tell from section 3.5.11.16 of the
> docs--such patterns have 16-bit resolution.
>
No, they actually have full 64 bits float resolution. But so do the
pigments.
Jerome
- --
+------------------------- Jerome M. BERGER ---------------------+
| mailto:jeb### [at] freefr | ICQ: 238062172 |
| http://jeberger.free.fr/ | Jabber: jeb### [at] jabberfr |
+---------------------------------+------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIKyXDd0kWM4JG3k8RAkhdAJ9nO6BXCLy0g1FZN0gwWDwngjaS0wCeJRsv
EX7lXMQ3buZkUeEzprvH4C8=
=ib+I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Post a reply to this message
|
|