|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Phil Cook wrote:
> And lo on Tue, 13 May 2008 10:58:06 +0100, Warp <war### [at] tag povray org>
> did spake, saying:
>
>> alphaQuad <alp### [at] earthlink net> wrote:
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duloxetine
>>
>> I was just wondering why should this be of any interest to us.
>
> What, you mean you're not interested in Duloxetine? How can you not be
> interested in Duloxetine? Isn't everyone interested and talking about
> Duloxetine? What the hell is Duloxetine anyway?
"Duloxetine is a SNRI (selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake
inhibitor)." ..."a drug which is indicated for major depressive disorder"
Has it not occurred to you that AQ might actually be warning you, so you
won't take a harmful drug in the future? You aren't judging a man by his
style of information dispensation, are you?
SSRI/SNRIs are *not* the wonder drugs the pharmaceuticals would have you
think they are. I've experienced SSRI-induced psychosis myself, although
I'll admit I was wrongly diagnosed at the time. Simple precaution could
have saved me a lot of trouble, a vehicle, a driver's license, and six
months.
Here's something I picked up from Googling. I'm sure there are plenty
more like it:
http://www.drugawareness.org/Archives/Miscellaneous/MRadmissions.html
> And what the heck has this got to do with TV commercials evil or otherwise?
Obviously the TV commercials are giving people the idea that they can
take SSRI/SNRIs for nearly any problem causing anxiety or depression. If
the 8% figure given by that article I linked to has any truth to it,
society could be heading for disaster at any given moment, should a
trigger occur...
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |