I like it.

There's some nice and subtle things going on with the petals on the 
flower. I had to stare at it a moment to satisfy myself that there was 
no subsurface scattering going on. I think what's happening is that 
there's some small irregularities in the geometry that show up as faint 
patterns, along with with a tiny hint of specular highlighting. Whatever 
it is, it's not immediately noticeable, but very nice once you do notice it.

The vase is great. Isosurface?

I almost missed the cat's tail thanks to my window being sized too 
small. It's perhaps a bit too bushy to be realistic, but I think I like 
it better this way. :-) I especially like the stray brown hairs on the 
top that point leftwards. What macro did you use for the hair?

Barney Hellerman wrote:
 > Hi.  I figured it might be time to start tossing up an occasional
 > render.

Please do more!

 >  Please expect my doodles to be random and meaningless.

If this is random and meaningless, I'm curious what happens when you 
produce something serious and meaningful. :-)

-- 
William Tracy
afi### [at] gmailcom -- wtr### [at] calpolyedu

    This offended Michel's sense of meaning, but there was nothing to be 
done about that, except to alter Michel's sense of what was meaningful.
     -- Kim Stanley Robinson, _Blue Mars_

Post a reply to this message