Chambers wrote:

> It boggles the mind, doesn't it?  That we've spent fourty years 
> discovering the necessity of features that Simula had, but were 
> considered too advanced for the time?

I'd comment on that, but the link doesn't appear to work...

> Kind of like how many algorithms in CG were actually written about in 
> the 70s, but computers were too slow to implement them realtime until now.

Well, in fairness, CG *is* in inherantly math-intensive field.

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message