Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:

> > Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:
> >> Hmm... Looks like there are some C++ wrappers around MPFR that would 
> >> make it quite simpler. And when I say simpler, I mean that in many 
> >> cases, replacing 'double' with 'mpfr_class' would be all (who said 
> >> operator overloading was bad?)
> > 
> >   There may be wrappers, but are they efficient?

> Using MPFR wouldn't be efficient in the first place (compared to plain 
> old doubles), so...

  That's not really what I asked.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message